<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time Analytics &#8211; Is Correlation and Jiseki connected?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://orpheus.asia/2011/10/23/time-analytics-is-correlation-and-jiseki-connected/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://orpheus.asia/2011/10/23/time-analytics-is-correlation-and-jiseki-connected/</link>
	<description>Global Alternative Research</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 17:07:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domnita</title>
		<link>http://orpheus.asia/2011/10/23/time-analytics-is-correlation-and-jiseki-connected/#comment-932</link>
		<dc:creator>Domnita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 19:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orpheus.asia/?p=10205#comment-932</guid>
		<description>Yes, Correlation still remains cyclical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Correlation still remains cyclical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debi</title>
		<link>http://orpheus.asia/2011/10/23/time-analytics-is-correlation-and-jiseki-connected/#comment-927</link>
		<dc:creator>Debi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 17:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orpheus.asia/?p=10205#comment-927</guid>
		<description>Hi Avinash,
   Orpheus had another story saying Correlation is cyclical. Whether that will also hold true with respect to this theory. Can you please check from 2000 onwards?

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Avinash,<br />
   Orpheus had another story saying Correlation is cyclical. Whether that will also hold true with respect to this theory. Can you please check from 2000 onwards?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

